Showing posts with label Hurricane Irene. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Hurricane Irene. Show all posts

Friday, November 16, 2012

The Undermining of America - HAARP and the New World Order (Part 2 - 2011)

 
 
Incredibly, the foray into the ultimate goal of New World Order seems to be growing and the cloak of misdirection is just beginning.  Yesterday, I covered what seemed to be the beginning of the use of HAARP to control the weather for political gain in this current administration. At this point, I am still researching strange weather phenomena and governmental actions in previous administrations, which I am positive, will exist. Now, it is time to continue on breaking down this string of concentrated coincidences. We will spend this article documenting the eventful year of 2011, starting with the tragedies suffered in Joplin, Missouri.
 
 
From all accounts, there were some extreme HAARP readings in the time preceding the devastating tornados that ravaged Joplin, Missouri. While the specific numerical values of those levels are not available to the extent they are now, “HAARP Rings” were found on multiple weather RADAR systems prior to the ordeal. In a strange twist, this storm, coupled with some recent flooding not only fit the profile of the United Nations famed Agenda 21 for population control, it also coincided with the signing of another Executive Order, Executive Order 13574 of May 23, 2011, Authorizing the Implementation of Certain Sanctions Set Forth in the Iran Sanctions Act of 1996, as Amended. It authorizes the government to seize assets of a “sanctioned person” in a battle against terrorism.
 
 
This is the first time you see the term “sanctioned” person in use and it will be a key theme moving forward. What is a sanctioned person? By loose definition, it could be someone with multiple guns, someone with a stockpile of ammunition, someone who has a stash of gold or silver, and the best someone with seven days of stored food. Honestly, that describes many Americans. Of course, some will argue that this mentions Iran specifically, but in reading it, it only calls Iran by name once and uses the reference United States Person on more than one occasion.
 
 
The next date is September 9, 2011, the same day that we outlined in one of our other HAARP articles, when Hurricane Irene bore down on the East Coast, an earthquake hit Vancouver, and there was destruction in Central America. On that date, we did not see President Obama intently watching the devastation in real time in the White House Situation Room like with Hurricane Sandy. In fact, he was busy signing Executive Order 13584 - Developing an Integrated Strategic Counterterrorism Communications Initiative and Establishing a Temporary Organization to Support Certain Government-wide Communications Activities Directed Abroad. From the name, and for the most part in reading it, it is an anti-terrorism order. Yet, a closer look would reveal that it authorizes a special agency inside the State Department to create a communications link monitoring terrorist activities against American citizens in national and international areas. Really, this one is not extremely dangerous by itself, but again, this is one of many to come.
 
 
After this order, things quieted down, until Executive Order 13590 - Authorizing the Imposition of Certain Sanctions with Respect to the Provisions of Goods, Services, Technology, or Support for Iran's Energy and Petrochemical Sectors signed on November 20, 2011.  This was an interesting order because the term “sanctioned person” was used again. Coincidently, that date also matched a day where severe weather along with heavy rain started for the parts of the United States, including heavy precipitation in the Northwest that measured at least seven inches in some areas.
 
 
To close out 2011, we move to December, when President Obama signs the extremely contentious National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA). This act has been in place since the early 2000s and has been controversial since its inception. If you have not heard of the act, you must be out of the loop. This act authorizes $662 billion in funding for the defense of the United States and its interests abroad. It includes items such as Department of Defense health care costs, counter-terrorism within the U.S. and abroad and military modernization. It also imposes economic sanctions against Iran (section 1045), commissions appraisals of the military capabilities of countries such as Iran, China, and Russia, refocuses the strategic goals of NATO, and gives governors the ability to request the help of military reservists in the event of a hurricane, earthquake, flood, terrorist attack or other disaster.
 
 
While those issues may not seem out of line, the most controversial provisions are contained in Title X, Subtitle D, entitled Counter-Terrorism. These include sub-sections 1021 and 1022, which deal with detention of persons the government suspects of involvement in terrorism. The controversy was to their legal meaning and potential implications for abuse of Presidential authority. Although the White House and Senate sponsors maintain that the Authorization for Use of Military Force (AUMF) already grants presidential authority for indefinite detention, or the creation of a kill list, the act states that Congress "affirms" this authority and makes specific provisions as to the exercise of that authority for indefinite detention without trial.  Of course, separately these mean little, but as a whole, create a tangled web. Especially when you dig a bit deeper in natural disasters with somewhat troubling political undercurrents involved.
 
 
Do you see how these events are connected, and at the price of the freedoms granted in the Constitution of the United States. The combination of the unconstitutional portions of the NDAA, coupled with the powers granted in these executive orders sit at the heart of something bigger than the War on Terror. Think about what we have heard, Osama Bin Laden is Dead; the terrorists are on the run. Even if that was the case, and it is not, why do we have a need for so many covert orders that have to potential to suppress Constitutional Rights? The only reason I can see is something much darker, something mentioned by President George H.W. Bush, the New World Order. A reference he made multiple times including once on September 11, 1990 and then again in his most famous statement in March 1991.

“Until now, the world we’ve known has been a world divided – a world of barbed wire and concrete block, conflict and cold war. Now, we can see a new world coming into view. A world in which there is the very real prospect of a new world order.”
President George H.W. Bush
 
 

Friday, November 9, 2012

The Documented Facts of the Earthquake - HAARP - Hurricane Connection

 
 
While some readers of this and other blogs that have been covering the disturbing trend of rising HAARP signals in the United States and their impact on natural disasters may think that this is nothing but conspiracy theory or the stuff of make believe. Moreover, to them, maybe it is, as they could never believe that the government would do such a thing. To them, I say Wake Up! HAARP and the ability of the government to control weather systems is real.
 
Over the past couple weeks, I have shown the connections between HAARP and these events, even outlining different facets of HAARP in multiple posts. Incredibly, in researching things in a deeper level, I made a disturbing discovery that may prove another link into this mystery. Yes, that potential smoking gun is made up of more natural disasters, but it is hard to look past the eerie timing that all of these events have in common. Of course, some will argue that these are just coincidence. I say, one time may be a coincidence, three documented occurrences are fact.
 
Earlier this week on November 7, many know that Winter Storm Bree, a Nor’easter, bore down on the already devastated areas of New York and New Jersey that were ravaged by Super Storm Sandy. Here are the pieces of the puzzle that were discovered in researching these events:

  1. High HAARP Readings were recorded centered over those areas in the path of the storm.
  2. A 6.4 magnitude earthquake was recorded off the coast of Vancouver.
  3. A 7.4 magnitude earthquake was recorded off the coast of Guatemala in Central America.

 
For some, again, they will say coincidence, and that the Vancouver coast is prone for earthquakes. Yes, it is, but in this research, I took only magnitude 6.0 or above earthquakes into account, as that is when the damage starts to increase above normal levels. However, if that is happenstance, how can nearly all three of those facts be in place a week before (October 27) when Hurricane Sandy smashed into the East Coast of the United States? Here are those facts:
 
  1. Highest HAARP Readings ever recorded were in place in the direct path of the storm.
  2. A 7.7 magnitude earthquake was recorded off the coast of Vancouver.
  3. The Popocatepetl Volcano in Central Mexico increased moderate intensity explosion frequency, which died down as the HAARP signals on the East Coast reduced.
 
 
I can see the strange similarities, can you? Now, I will admit when I found this, I was surprised and needed more information and had to dig a bit deeper into an investigation to prove it was not just a weird twist of fate. That is when I found the discovery, which to me, demonstrated that these events are somehow connected. The events are quite similar to the first two that I outlined including HAARP signals, earthquakes and a hurricane. Here are those details from September 9, 2011:
 
  1. High HAARP Readings recorded in the Northeast and Hurricane Irene heads directly toward New York and New Jersey.
  2. A 6.7 magnitude earthquake was recorded off the coast of Vancouver.
  3. Multiple earthquakes were recorded off the coast of Guatemala beginning early September 2011.

 
Can you see the similarities yet? The answers should sit right there. Oh well, at this point, I am just starting to dive further back into history trying to find more similar occurrences that meet these same dynamics and I will continue to compile data to prove this connection.