Incredibly, the foray into the ultimate goal of New World Order
seems to be growing and the cloak of misdirection is just beginning. Yesterday, I covered what seemed to be the
beginning of the use of HAARP to control the weather for political gain in this
current administration. At this point, I am still researching strange weather
phenomena and governmental actions in previous administrations, which I am positive,
will exist. Now, it is time to continue on breaking down this string of concentrated
coincidences. We will spend this article documenting the eventful year of 2011,
starting with the tragedies suffered in Joplin,
Missouri.
From all accounts, there were some extreme HAARP readings in
the time preceding the devastating tornados that ravaged Joplin, Missouri.
While the specific numerical values of those levels are not available to the
extent they are now, “HAARP Rings” were found on multiple weather RADAR systems
prior to the ordeal. In a strange twist, this storm, coupled with some recent
flooding not only fit the profile of the United Nations famed Agenda 21 for
population control, it also coincided with the signing of another Executive
Order, Executive Order 13574 of May 23, 2011, Authorizing the Implementation of
Certain Sanctions Set Forth in the Iran Sanctions Act of 1996, as Amended. It
authorizes the government to seize assets of a “sanctioned person” in a battle
against terrorism.
This is the first time you see the term “sanctioned” person
in use and it will be a key theme moving forward. What is a sanctioned person?
By loose definition, it could be someone with multiple guns, someone with a
stockpile of ammunition, someone who has a stash of gold or silver, and the
best someone with seven days of stored food. Honestly, that describes many
Americans. Of course, some will argue that this mentions Iran specifically, but in reading it, it only
calls Iran
by name once and uses the reference United States Person on more than one
occasion.
The next date is September 9, 2011, the same day that we
outlined in one of our other HAARP articles, when Hurricane Irene bore down on
the East Coast, an earthquake hit Vancouver, and
there was destruction in Central America. On
that date, we did not see President Obama intently watching the devastation in
real time in the White House Situation Room like with Hurricane Sandy. In fact,
he was busy signing Executive Order 13584 - Developing an Integrated Strategic
Counterterrorism Communications Initiative and Establishing a Temporary
Organization to Support Certain Government-wide Communications Activities
Directed Abroad. From the name, and for the most part in reading it, it is an anti-terrorism
order. Yet, a closer look would reveal that it authorizes a special agency
inside the State Department to create a communications link monitoring
terrorist activities against American citizens in national and international
areas. Really, this one is not extremely dangerous by itself, but again, this
is one of many to come.
After this order, things quieted down, until Executive Order
13590 - Authorizing the Imposition of Certain Sanctions with Respect to the
Provisions of Goods, Services, Technology, or Support for Iran's Energy
and Petrochemical Sectors signed on November 20, 2011. This was an interesting order because the
term “sanctioned person” was used again. Coincidently, that date also matched a
day where severe weather along with heavy rain started for the parts of the United States,
including heavy precipitation in the Northwest that measured at least seven
inches in some areas.
To close out 2011, we move to December, when President Obama
signs the extremely contentious National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA). This
act has been in place since the early 2000s and has been controversial since
its inception. If you have not heard of the act, you must be out of the loop.
This act authorizes $662 billion in funding for the defense of the United States
and its interests abroad. It includes items such as Department of Defense
health care costs, counter-terrorism within the U.S. and abroad and military
modernization. It also imposes economic sanctions against Iran (section 1045),
commissions appraisals of the military capabilities of countries such as Iran,
China, and Russia, refocuses the strategic goals of NATO, and gives governors
the ability to request the help of military reservists in the event of a
hurricane, earthquake, flood, terrorist attack or other disaster.
While those issues may not seem out of line, the most
controversial provisions are contained in Title X, Subtitle D, entitled
Counter-Terrorism. These include sub-sections 1021 and 1022, which deal with
detention of persons the government suspects of involvement in terrorism. The
controversy was to their legal meaning and potential implications for abuse of
Presidential authority. Although the White House and Senate sponsors
maintain that the Authorization for Use of Military Force (AUMF) already grants
presidential authority for indefinite detention, or the creation of a kill
list, the act states that Congress "affirms" this authority and makes
specific provisions as to the exercise of that authority for indefinite
detention without trial.
Of course,
separately these mean little, but as a whole, create a tangled web. Especially
when you dig a bit deeper in natural disasters with somewhat troubling
political undercurrents involved.
Do you see how these events are connected, and at the price
of the freedoms granted in the Constitution of the United States. The combination of
the unconstitutional portions of the NDAA, coupled with the powers granted in
these executive orders sit at the heart of something bigger than the War on
Terror. Think about what we have heard, Osama Bin Laden is Dead; the terrorists
are on the run. Even if that was the case, and it is not, why do we have a need
for so many covert orders that have to potential to suppress Constitutional Rights?
The only reason I can see is something much darker, something mentioned by
President George H.W. Bush, the New World Order. A reference he made multiple
times including once on September 11, 1990 and then again in his most famous statement
in March 1991.
“Until now, the world we’ve known has been a world divided –
a world of barbed wire and concrete block, conflict and cold war. Now, we can see a new world coming into view. A world in which
there is the very real prospect of a new world order.”
President George H.W. Bush
